The Lex Fridman postcast is one of the most popular on YouTube. Lex is almost always non-judgemental and extremely warm toward his guests. This warmth seemed to stop at Kanye West and the topic of Anti-Semitism.

⁠Early into the podcast, Kanye writes down "Engineering" on his piece of paper. In a condesending tone, Lex continues to misuse the word "Engineer" to muse Kayne, almost as if an MD were to mock Dr.Dre for his claim to the PhD title.

⁠The first while, Kayne appeared relaxed, speaking in a very inchoerent and difficult to understand, showering himself with compliments, and Lex awkwardly repeating those compliments with a smirk. Whenever Lex began disagreeing with Kanye, he'd go back to using the word Engineering, for just about..everything.

⁠This dynamic shifted ike a Mental Health patient, experiencing a BiPolar episode when Lex told Kanye he must apologize sencerely, and read diaries from the 1930's on the Jewish Holocaust. Lex challenged Kanye to have some "balls" and go after each of these Jewish men as men, and not Jews.

Kanye suddenly began speaking in a street tone, and Black Kanye took over The Lex Fridman Show. Black Kayne was methodical, extremely persuasive and didn't miss a beat.

Here's why Kanye West was right on Anti-Semitism and the collective punishment targeting him:

Lex Fridman continued to speak about reading books from the 1930's as if diaries written about the Holocaust are enough evidence to put the Anti-Semitism debate to rest. What Lex failed to mention, and Kanye alike, is that the "World Jewish Congress" was founded in 1936. This Congress would unite all Jews to collaborate and cooperate in regular meetings. Business folks would meet from around the world and conduct deals and agreements. They'd even go so far as to enforce collective economic sanctions against anyone they want to supress.

Enter: Kayne's Argument

Kanye continued to suggest that a boycott is in progress, and a group of Jewish business men are conspiring to cancel him. In the past days, almost everyone is refusing Kanye and cancelling out the business deals they have with him. So, just as Lex had suggested Kanye read about Jews in the 1930's;

is it plausible that a group of Jewish Men, that connect and deal internationally with each other, may all decide on cutting one Black American man out of their business dealings? How far fetched is this acqusation?

⁠Exit: Lex Fridman's Argument

Lex suggested that Kayne should go after each person by name. This would open Kanye up to a handful of lawsuits and financially cripple Kanye, tying up all of his time and assets for years.

In this scenario, when Kanye asked Lex to expose those people with him, Lex agrees but doesn't follow up by requesting the names of those individuals. A clear bluff when clearly Lex wants to avoid contraversy with any major businessman in the Jewish community while suggesting that Kanye martyr himself.

Is there a double standard for Jews and Non-Jews as Kanye suggested?

Kanye outlines that if one black man is charged in a car, the entire car will be charged. He is not wrong as there is more than enough video evidence for this happening in America. If a car full of Jewish men are pulled over, there's a strong likelyhood the driver isn't identified as Jewish male, but a "white anglosaxon male". This is a very important distinction, because when a Jewish man is lauded for their accomplishments, they're considered a Jew. When a Jewish man commits a crime, he's anything but a Jew. Epstein, Weinstein, Maxwell, and so many other Jewish men and sometimes women, are not spoken of as Jews in the media for committing very high profile crimes. Mind you, we are cited crime statistics by Black America, but not cited any statistics about Pedophelia's in the Jewish Community. Black Americans account for nearly 14% of America. A 2.5% is the figure for Jews. Why is it that Jews can be appreciated as a collective for their remarkable accomplishments in society, but ignored for their disproportionate levels of crime?

Is Kanye West being an anti-semite?

Kanye West did not call for the torture of Jews, nor did he speak about expelling or harming any Jew. In fact, Kanye explicitly spoke about the interactions he had in his personal life, with numerous Jewish businessmen that have harmed him. If Epstein, Weinstein and Maxwell are Jewish, would it not be wrong to say that a group of high profile Jews have been convicted for grotesque crimes? If you agree with Lex Fridman, you'd suggest that those were just people and not Jews. Where this argument by Lex Fridman falls apart, is in how these Jewish men and women gained prominance in society. These individuals explicitly benefited from Israeli funding, intelligence services and employment. They not only gain funding but also attend global meetings tailored only for Jewish men and women. More specficially in Epstein and Maxwell's case, were funded by Israel the only Jewish Nation. Israel claims to be the homeland for all Jews, collectively.

Therefore, when we speak about Kanye's personal experiences being anti-semitic, we must acknowledge that when a group of people collaborate to sink one, troubled Black American man, it's their choice and they have the right to cancel any deals with Kanye. Kanye also has the right to call these folks out for their actions and not be silenced and ignored by media outlets owned by Jewish men. These cancellations only cement Kanye's argument as valid, showing the solidarity in opposition of Kanye.

Lex cannot logically argue that the business world run by "Kayne's haters" operate as individuals. Each of these individuals hide behind a corporation. Each corporation recieves funding and direction from wealthy financiers and if Kanye is telling the truth, those sources are almost exclusvely Jewish.

In closing, Kanye is being silenced, discriminated against and cancelled for using his words. Ultimately, in his awkward, self indulgant and apparent psychosis managed to completely expose Lex Fridman and his biases, reducing Lex to a young boy with his MP3 player, listening to Jesus Walks.